SCOREBOB
06.11.2026
W15 Monastir 29 2026

Y. Kim vs S. Husar - W15 Monastir 29 - 28 Oct 2026

Y. Kim vs S. Husar is listed under W15 Monastir 29 2026 with score, status, set context, ranking signals and head-to-head information when available.
Finished W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals Surface
Sets S1 S2 Y. Kim 3 2 S. Husar 6 6

Match answer summary

W15 Monastir 29 2026
Status
Finished
Winner
S. Husar
Round / surface
W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals
Odds signals
0 pre-match / 0 live
Ranking context
S. Husar WTA #1365
H2H meetings
1
Recent form
Y. Kim 0-2; S. Husar 1-3
Y. Kim vs S. Husar is a tennis match in W15 Monastir 29 2026 (W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 0 - 2. Winner: S. Husar. Ranking context: S. Husar WTA #1365. H2H context: 1 known meetings. Recent form: Y. Kim 0-2; S. Husar 1-3. Odds rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live.

Match context

Finished
Date2026-10-28 11:00:00
TournamentW15 Monastir 29 2026
RoundW15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals
Surface-
StatusFinished
TourItf Women Singles
TierITF
WinnerS. Husar
Point-by-pointNo

Match signals

set scores
Score contextYes
Set scoreYes
H2H contextYes
TournamentW15 Monastir 29 2026
Pre-match odds rows0
Live odds rows0

H2H summary

Visible
Total H2H1
Official H2H1
Exhibition H2H0
Latest meeting2026-10-28

Players

Unknown country / Poland Poland
Player 1Y. Kim
Player 2S. Husar
Country Unknown country / Poland Poland

Ranking context

1

Y. Kim

Ranking -

S. Husar

WTA #1365 / 6 pts

Latest H2H meetings

1
Date Tournament Match Score Winner
2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 Y. Kim vs S. Husar 0 - 2 S. Husar

Player profiles and stats

2
Y. Kim
Tennis
Stats rows: 0 · Finished matches: 3 · Tournaments: 3
S. Husar
Poland Poland
Stats rows: 0 · Finished matches: 7 · Tournaments: 4

Tournament draw context

17
Order Date Round Match Score
1 2026-10-27 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals S. Rutlauka vs N. Cakarun 2 - 0
2 2026-10-27 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals A. Shkutova vs I. Barrera Aguirre 2 - 0
3 2026-10-27 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals S. Struvay vs C. Zhu 0 - 2
4 2026-10-27 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals A. Banks vs V. Lansaman 0 - 1
5 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals A. Bhopal vs S. C. Rojas 0 - 2
6 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals L. De Ezcurra vs M. Lazarenko 0 - 2
7 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals C. Dibenedetto vs M. Lei 0 - 2
8 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals F. Gandolfi vs M. Komano 2 - 0
9 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals V. N. Sarganella vs A. Garcia-Patron Canals 1 - 1
10 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals N. Sozaonova vs A. Gentili 2 - 1
11 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals M. Vogt vs Y. Watanabe 2 - 0
12 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals A. Gergec vs N. Dho 1 - 2
13 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals E. Gharbi vs B. Xu 0 - 2
14 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals C. Langlais vs P. Gloeckner 2 - 1
15 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals A. Lizunova vs K. Nishimura 0 - 2
16 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals K. Voronina vs S. Husar -
17 2026-10-28 W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals Y. Kim vs S. Husar 0 - 2

Recent player form

7

Y. Kim

2026-10-27 Y. Hong L
2026-05-27 D. Soke L

S. Husar

2026-10-29 K. Nishimura L
2026-10-28 K. Voronina -
2026-10-21 K. Nishimura L
2026-09-11 J. Adams L
2026-09-10 A. Hertel W

Tennis match FAQ

W15 Monastir 29 2026

What tennis match details are shown here?

Y. Kim vs S. Husar is a tennis match in W15 Monastir 29 2026 (W15 Monastir 29 - 1/16-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 0 - 2. Winner: S. Husar. Ranking context: S. Husar WTA #1365. H2H context: 1 known meetings. Recent form: Y. Kim 0-2; S. Husar 1-3. Odds rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live.

Does this page include player form and ranking context?

Ranking context: S. Husar WTA #1365. Recent form: Y. Kim 0-2; S. Husar 1-3.

Are tennis odds and point-by-point details available?

Available tennis market rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live. Point-by-point rows are shown when the tennis read-model returns them for this match.

Why can some tennis match blocks be empty?

ScoreBob renders optional tennis blocks only when the parser read-model has enough reliable data for that match.