SCOREBOB
26.10.2026
W15 Sapporo 2 2026

A. Miyamoto vs G. Jang - W15 Sapporo 2 - 27 Jun 2026

A. Miyamoto vs G. Jang is listed under W15 Sapporo 2 2026 with score, status, set context, ranking signals and head-to-head information when available.
Finished W15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals Surface
Sets S1 S2 S3 A. Miyamoto 4 6 7 G. Jang 6 0 5

Match answer summary

W15 Sapporo 2 2026
Status
Finished
Winner
A. Miyamoto
Round / surface
W15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals
Odds signals
160 pre-match / 0 live
Ranking context
A. Miyamoto WTA #778; G. Jang WTA #770
H2H meetings
1
Recent form
A. Miyamoto 3-2; G. Jang 1-4
A. Miyamoto vs G. Jang is a tennis match in W15 Sapporo 2 2026 (W15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 2 - 1. Winner: A. Miyamoto. Ranking context: A. Miyamoto WTA #778; G. Jang WTA #770. H2H context: 1 known meetings. Recent form: A. Miyamoto 3-2; G. Jang 1-4. Odds rows: 160 pre-match / 0 live.

Match context

Finished
Date2026-06-27 07:00:00
TournamentW15 Sapporo 2 2026
RoundW15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals
Surface-
StatusFinished
TourItf Women Singles
TierITF
WinnerA. Miyamoto
Point-by-pointNo

Match signals

set scores
Score contextYes
Set scoreYes
H2H contextYes
TournamentW15 Sapporo 2 2026
Pre-match odds rows160
Live odds rows0

H2H summary

Visible
Total H2H1
Official H2H1
Exhibition H2H0
Latest meeting2026-06-27

Players

Japan Japan / South Korea
Player 1A. Miyamoto
Player 2G. Jang
Country Japan Japan / South Korea

Ranking context

2

A. Miyamoto

WTA #778 / 44 pts

G. Jang

WTA #770 / 45 pts

Latest H2H meetings

1
Date Tournament Match Score Winner
2026-06-27 W15 Sapporo 2 Ayumi Miyamoto vs Gaeul Jang 2 - 1 Ayumi Miyamoto

Player profiles and stats

2
Ayumi Miyamoto
Japan Japan
Stats rows: 0 · Finished matches: 16 · Tournaments: 5
Gaeul Jang
South Korea
Stats rows: 0 · Finished matches: 22 · Tournaments: 10

Pre-match odds

160 rows
1xBet
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Away / -0.5
1.92
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Away / +1.5
2.18
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Away / -1.5
1.71
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Home / -0.5
1.77
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Home / +1.5
1.59
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Home / -1.5
1.59
Asian Handicap (2nd Set)
Asian Handicap (2nd Set) Away / -0.5
1.93
Asian Handicap (2nd Set)
Asian Handicap (2nd Set) Home / -0.5
1.74
bet365
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Away / -1.5
1.8
Asian Handicap (1st Set)
Asian Handicap (1st Set) Home / -1.5
1.9
Correct Score 1st Half
0:6
23.0
Correct Score 1st Half
1:6
13.0
Correct Score 1st Half
2:6
9.0
Correct Score 1st Half
3:6
8.0
Correct Score 1st Half
4:6
8.0
Correct Score 1st Half
5:7
15.0

Tournament draw context

2
Order Date Round Match Score
16 2026-06-27 W15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals M. Kuramochi vs S. Noguchi 2 - 0
17 2026-06-27 W15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals A. Miyamoto vs G. Jang 2 - 1

Recent player form

10

A. Miyamoto

2026-09-15 R. Matsuda L
2026-06-28 M. Kuramochi L
2026-06-26 M. Aikawa W
2026-06-25 K. Sawashiro W
2026-06-24 A. Ishii W

G. Jang

2026-10-08 F. A. Lin L
2026-10-07 K. Wang W
2026-09-29 Z. Jiang L
2026-09-09 K. Sawashiro L
2026-08-18 N. Schunk L

Tennis match FAQ

W15 Sapporo 2 2026

What tennis match details are shown here?

A. Miyamoto vs G. Jang is a tennis match in W15 Sapporo 2 2026 (W15 Sapporo 2 - Semi-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 2 - 1. Winner: A. Miyamoto. Ranking context: A. Miyamoto WTA #778; G. Jang WTA #770. H2H context: 1 known meetings. Recent form: A. Miyamoto 3-2; G. Jang 1-4. Odds rows: 160 pre-match / 0 live.

Does this page include player form and ranking context?

Ranking context: A. Miyamoto WTA #778; G. Jang WTA #770. Recent form: A. Miyamoto 3-2; G. Jang 1-4.

Are tennis odds and point-by-point details available?

Available tennis market rows: 160 pre-match / 0 live. Point-by-point rows are shown when the tennis read-model returns them for this match.

Why can some tennis match blocks be empty?

ScoreBob renders optional tennis blocks only when the parser read-model has enough reliable data for that match.