A. Guillen Meza
ATP
#266 / 204 pts
Cattolica (Italy) - Qualification
A. Guillen Meza vs I. Simakin
A. Guillen Meza vs I. Simakin is listed under Cattolica (Italy) - Qualification with score, status, set context, ranking signals and head-to-head information when available.
Finished
Cattolica - 1/16-finals
Surface
A. Guillen Meza
2 - 1
I. Simakin
Sets
S1
S2
S3
A. Guillen Meza
3
7
7
I. Simakin
6
6
6
Match answer summary
Cattolica (Italy) - QualificationStatus
Finished
Winner
-
Round / surface
Cattolica - 1/16-finals
Odds signals
0 pre-match / 0 live
Ranking context
A. Guillen Meza ATP #266; I. Simakin ATP #299
Recent form
A. Guillen Meza 0-2; I. Simakin 0-2
A. Guillen Meza vs I. Simakin is a tennis match in Cattolica (Italy) - Qualification (Cattolica - 1/16-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 2 - 1. Ranking context: A. Guillen Meza ATP #266; I. Simakin ATP #299. Recent form: A. Guillen Meza 0-2; I. Simakin 0-2. Odds rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live.
Match context
FinishedDate2026-06-09 13:10:00
TournamentCattolica (Italy) - Qualification
RoundCattolica - 1/16-finals
Surface-
StatusFinished
TourChallenger Men Singles
TierChallenger
Winner-
Point-by-pointYes
Match signals
set scoresScore contextYes
Set scoreYes
H2H contextNo
TournamentCattolica (Italy) - Qualification
Pre-match odds rows0
Live odds rows0
H2H summary
NoTotal H2H0
Official H2H0
Exhibition H2H0
Latest meeting-
Players
Ecuador / WorldPlayer 1A. Guillen Meza
Player 2I. Simakin
Country
Ecuador
/
World
Ranking context
2I. Simakin
ATP
#299 / 177 pts
Player profiles and stats
2A. Guillen Meza
I. Simakin
Point-by-point
59| Set | Game | Point | Score | Serve | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 1 | 0 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 2 | 1 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 3 | 1 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 4 | 1 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 5 | 1 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 6 | 2 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 7 | 2 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 8 | 3 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 9 | 3 - 6 | - | - |
| - | - | 10 | 0 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 11 | 0 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 12 | 1 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 13 | 2 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 14 | 3 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 15 | 3 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 16 | 4 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 17 | 4 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 18 | 5 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 19 | 5 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 20 | 6 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 21 | 6 - 6 | - | - |
| - | - | 22 | 1 - 0 | - | - |
| - | - | 23 | 1 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 24 | 1 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 25 | 1 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 26 | 2 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 27 | 3 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 28 | 4 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 29 | 5 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 30 | 5 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 31 | 6 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 32 | 6 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 33 | 7 - 6 | - | - |
| - | - | 34 | 7 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 35 | 1 - 0 | - | - |
| - | - | 36 | 1 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 37 | 2 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 38 | 3 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 39 | 3 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 40 | 4 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 41 | 4 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 42 | 4 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 43 | 4 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 44 | 5 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 45 | 5 - 6 | - | - |
| - | - | 46 | 6 - 6 | - | - |
| - | - | 47 | 0 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 48 | 1 - 1 | - | - |
| - | - | 49 | 1 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 50 | 2 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 51 | 3 - 2 | - | - |
| - | - | 52 | 3 - 3 | - | - |
| - | - | 53 | 3 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 54 | 7 - 6 | - | - |
| - | - | 55 | 4 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 56 | 5 - 4 | - | - |
| - | - | 57 | 5 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 58 | 6 - 5 | - | - |
| - | - | 59 | 7 - 5 | - | - |
Tournament draw context
19| Order | Date | Round | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | L. Broady vs A. Vasilev | - |
| 15 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | L. Mikrut vs I. Xilas | - |
| 16 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | M. H. Rehberg vs S. Travaglia | - |
| 23 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | L. Broady vs I. Xilas | 2 - 1 |
| 24 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | M. Ribecai vs F. Agamenone | 1 - 2 |
| 25 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | P. Basile vs R. Brancaccio | 0 - 2 |
| 26 | 2026-06-08 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | A. Guerrieri vs D. Svrcina | 2 - 1 |
| 27 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | M. H. Rehberg vs R. Carballes Baena | 0 - 2 |
| 28 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | M. Tobon vs A. Vasilev | 0 - 2 |
| 29 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | G. Ferrari vs H. S. Callejon | 2 - 0 |
| 30 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | C. Sanchez Jover vs M. Dodig | 2 - 0 |
| 31 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | G. Bueno vs F. Forti | 1 - 2 |
| 32 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | P. Nesterov vs M. Cecchinato | 0 - 2 |
| 33 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | A. Guillen Meza vs I. Simakin | 2 - 1 |
| 34 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | J. De Jong vs O. Milic | 2 - 0 |
| 35 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | S. Pieri vs O. Roca Batalla | 0 - 2 |
| 36 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | D. Lajovic vs J. Forejtek | 2 - 1 |
| 37 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | M. Kasnikowski vs E. Dalla Valle | 0 - 2 |
| 38 | 2026-06-09 | Cattolica - 1/16-finals | F. Bondioli vs C. A. Caniato | 2 - 1 |
Recent player form
4A. Guillen Meza
2026-06-16
F. Bondioli
L
2026-06-11
M. Cecchinato
L
I. Simakin
2026-06-16
J. Vasami
L
2026-06-01
M. Cecchinato
L
Tennis match FAQ
Cattolica (Italy) - QualificationWhat tennis match details are shown here?
A. Guillen Meza vs I. Simakin is a tennis match in Cattolica (Italy) - Qualification (Cattolica - 1/16-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 2 - 1. Ranking context: A. Guillen Meza ATP #266; I. Simakin ATP #299. Recent form: A. Guillen Meza 0-2; I. Simakin 0-2. Odds rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live.
Does this page include player form and ranking context?
Ranking context: A. Guillen Meza ATP #266; I. Simakin ATP #299. Recent form: A. Guillen Meza 0-2; I. Simakin 0-2.
Are tennis odds and point-by-point details available?
Available tennis market rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live. Point-by-point rows are shown when the tennis read-model returns them for this match.
Why can some tennis match blocks be empty?
ScoreBob renders optional tennis blocks only when the parser read-model has enough reliable data for that match.