SCOREBOB
18.06.2026
Birmingham

C. Naef vs M. Inglis

C. Naef vs M. Inglis is listed under Birmingham with score, status, set context, ranking signals and head-to-head information when available.
Finished Birmingham - 1/16-finals Surface
C. Naef
2 - 0
M. Inglis
Sets S1 S2 C. Naef 6 6 M. Inglis 2 3

Match answer summary

Birmingham
Status
Finished
Winner
-
Round / surface
Birmingham - 1/16-finals
Odds signals
0 pre-match / 0 live
Ranking context
C. Naef WTA #193; M. Inglis WTA #148
Recent form
C. Naef 0-5; M. Inglis 0-3
C. Naef vs M. Inglis is a tennis match in Birmingham (Birmingham - 1/16-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 2 - 0. Ranking context: C. Naef WTA #193; M. Inglis WTA #148. Recent form: C. Naef 0-5; M. Inglis 0-3. Odds rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live.

Match context

Finished
Date2026-06-03 14:20:00
TournamentBirmingham
RoundBirmingham - 1/16-finals
Surface-
StatusFinished
TourChallenger Women Singles
TierChallenger
Winner-
Point-by-pointYes

Match signals

set scores
Score contextYes
Set scoreYes
H2H contextNo
TournamentBirmingham
Pre-match odds rows0
Live odds rows0

H2H summary

No
Total H2H0
Official H2H0
Exhibition H2H0
Latest meeting-

Players

Switzerland Switzerland / Australia Australia
Player 1C. Naef
Player 2M. Inglis
Country Switzerland Switzerland / Australia Australia

Ranking context

2

C. Naef

WTA #193 / 385 pts

M. Inglis

WTA #148 / 516 pts

Player profiles and stats

2
C. Naef
Switzerland Switzerland
Stats rows: 140 · Finished matches: 11 · Tournaments: 2
M. Inglis
Australia Australia
Stats rows: 260 · Finished matches: 4 · Tournaments: 2

Point-by-point

17
Set Game Point Score Serve Winner
- - 1 1 - 0 - -
- - 2 1 - 1 - -
- - 3 2 - 1 - -
- - 4 3 - 1 - -
- - 5 4 - 1 - -
- - 6 4 - 2 - -
- - 7 5 - 2 - -
- - 8 6 - 2 - -
- - 9 1 - 0 - -
- - 10 1 - 1 - -
- - 11 2 - 1 - -
- - 12 2 - 2 - -
- - 13 3 - 2 - -
- - 14 4 - 2 - -
- - 15 5 - 2 - -
- - 16 5 - 3 - -
- - 17 6 - 3 - -

Tournament draw context

16
Order Date Round Match Score
20 2026-06-01 Birmingham - 1/16-finals E. Kalieva vs T. Gibson 2 - 1
21 2026-06-01 Birmingham - 1/16-finals M. Sawangkaew vs L. Klimovicova 2 - 0
22 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals A. Eala vs P. Hon 2 - 0
23 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals N. Bartunkova vs H. Dart 2 - 1
24 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals R. Masarova vs T. Martincova 2 - 1
25 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals M. Stojsavljevic vs E. Jones 2 - 1
26 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals G. Minnen vs A. Charaeva 0 - 2
27 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals M. Stoiana vs L. Sun 2 - 1
28 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals K. Day vs H. Vandewinkel 2 - 0
29 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals N. Hibino vs J. Tjen 1 - 2
30 2026-06-02 Birmingham - 1/16-finals G. Knutson vs J. Garland 2 - 0
31 2026-06-03 Birmingham - 1/16-finals T. Maria vs L. Fruhvirtova 2 - 0
32 2026-06-03 Birmingham - 1/16-finals C. Naef vs M. Inglis 2 - 0
33 2026-06-03 Birmingham - 1/16-finals A. Krueger vs H. Sakatsume 2 - 0
34 2026-06-04 Birmingham - 1/16-finals A. Tomljanovic vs K. Swan 0 - 1
36 2026-06-04 Birmingham - 1/16-finals T. Preston vs A. Dudeney 2 - 1

Recent player form

8

C. Naef

2026-06-14 A. Krueger L
2026-06-13 M. Stoiana L
2026-06-12 A. Urhobo L
2026-06-12 H. Tan L
2026-06-09 A. Korneeva L

M. Inglis

2026-06-09 S. Cirstea L
2026-06-07 H. Guo L
2026-06-07 A. Parks L

Tennis match FAQ

Birmingham

What tennis match details are shown here?

C. Naef vs M. Inglis is a tennis match in Birmingham (Birmingham - 1/16-finals). Status: Finished. Score: 2 - 0. Ranking context: C. Naef WTA #193; M. Inglis WTA #148. Recent form: C. Naef 0-5; M. Inglis 0-3. Odds rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live.

Does this page include player form and ranking context?

Ranking context: C. Naef WTA #193; M. Inglis WTA #148. Recent form: C. Naef 0-5; M. Inglis 0-3.

Are tennis odds and point-by-point details available?

Available tennis market rows: 0 pre-match / 0 live. Point-by-point rows are shown when the tennis read-model returns them for this match.

Why can some tennis match blocks be empty?

ScoreBob renders optional tennis blocks only when the parser read-model has enough reliable data for that match.